Roofing FLHA template for Canadian worksites
A roofing field-level hazard assessment (FLHA) checks the roof, access route, edges, openings, weather, materials and nearby people before the crew begins a specific task. Use this blank form at the actual site and update it when conditions or work stages change. It sits beside the employer's risk assessment, the fall-protection plan, any hot-work permit and the roof manufacturer's or engineer's instructions. It cannot turn an unverified anchor, fragile surface or unsafe weather into an approved method.
Roofing risks differ across residential, commercial and industrial work. CCOHS's residential roofing guidance calls for job-specific procedures, fall-protection planning, anchor identification, equipment inspection and, where applicable, rescue arrangements. Most roof work is regulated by a province or territory; federally regulated sites and project-specific rules need their own check. This template does not state one national fall height, setback or training card. For example, Ontario's construction working-at-heights training rule applies to workers using specified fall-protection methods on Ontario construction projects. Do not extend that exact credential requirement to every Canadian roof.
Roof, work and people block
| Field | Site-specific entry |
|---|---|
| Project, address, employer, principal/prime contractor and date | |
| Roof zone, elevation, pitch and work boundary | |
| Roof type, known fragile areas, skylights, openings and load information | |
| Task: survey, strip, repair, install, torch, lift or hand back | |
| Crew, supervisor, trades below and building occupants | |
| Formal assessment, fall plan, access plan and permit references | |
| Approved anchor/edge protection and inspection evidence | |
| Weather limit from approved method and current conditions | |
| Material delivery/lift plan and roof load limits | |
| Emergency/rescue plan, response contact and access point |
Use exact locations: “north roof, skylight bay 3” is better than “roof”. If the roof condition or structural capacity is unknown, stop and obtain the competent assessment before loading materials or walking the area. Treat a skylight as an opening unless there is verified protection suitable for the task. Ontario's construction hazard guidance expressly identifies unguarded skylights as fall hazards, but the underlying control must follow the law and design governing this site.
Workface check before roof access
| Check | Observation/evidence | Difference from plan? | Action / owner / GO-HOLD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ladder, scaffold, platform or other access secured and inspected | |||
| Edge, eaves, gable, parapet and openings protected | |||
| Roof surface, deck and structural condition confirmed | |||
| Approved anchors, lines and equipment checked | |||
| Fall clearance, swing path and rescue feasibility checked | |||
| Wind, rain, ice, heat, light and visibility within approved method | |||
| Material staging, mechanical lift and roof load within plan | |||
| Tools, fixings and debris contained against falling | |||
| Public, occupants and workers below excluded/protected | |||
| Hot work, flammables, fire watch and extinguisher where applicable | |||
| Electricity, rooftop plant and neighbouring trades coordinated |
The crew should observe each control, not merely tick it. “Guardrail complete and inspected along east edge” is useful; “fall protection yes” is not. The CCOHS fall-protection hierarchy supports selecting a means that prevents a fall where practicable before relying on a system that arrests one. The approved plan and local law determine the actual system. Do not select an anchor from appearance or place a lanyard where fall clearance is uncertain; have the competent person verify the design.
Access and surface gate
Check how workers and materials reach the roof, where they step off the access equipment and how the route is protected. A safe roof area does not help if the transfer point is exposed. Identify fragile panels, rooflights, degraded decking, temporary openings and areas where stripping has exposed the structure. Control access below openings as well as on the roof. If a surface gives way, rescue may be difficult; do not use a field card to guess its strength.
Weather and material gate
Record conditions at the roof, not just the ground forecast. Wind affects sheet material, lifts and balance. Rain, frost and heat change footing and material handling. Use the approved task method's conditions and the equipment manufacturer's limits. There is no defensible universal wind speed for all roof tasks. Keep materials within the verified roof loading and away from unprotected edges. Plan how offcuts, packaging and tools will be secured so a gust cannot send them onto people below.
Fire, substances and service gate
Torch-on membranes, kettles, grinding and other ignition-producing tasks may require a separate hot-work permit and fire plan. CCOHS roofing guidance identifies hot-work planning as a separate control. Confirm combustible materials, hidden cavities, rooftop equipment and fire-watch requirements with the site's authority. Review product safety data and exposure controls for adhesives, solvents, bitumen, dust or other substances used. If asbestos-containing material or another suspect legacy product is discovered, stop and obtain the site-specific assessment; a generic FLHA is not an abatement plan.
Task-step hazards and controls
| Step today | Person and harm mechanism | Verified control | Extra action and owner | GO / HOLD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access roof and set boundary | ||||
| Deliver/stage materials | ||||
| Strip or prepare surface | ||||
| Install or repair roofing | ||||
| Inspect, clear debris and hand back |
The control belongs to the task stage. During stripping, the crew may uncover a weak deck that was concealed during setup. During installation, a worker may have to approach a new edge or rooflight. At handback, guardrails and barriers may be removed only under a controlled sequence. Recheck the FLHA at each transition and ensure the formal plan still describes the work actually being done.
Stop-work and rescue review
| Trigger | Immediate decision | Evidence before restart |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown roof strength, failed deck or newly exposed opening | Withdraw and secure access | Competent structural and fall-control review |
| Damaged anchor, line or edge protection | Stop exposed work | Suitable replacement/repair and inspection |
| Weather outside task limit | Stop and secure material | Conditions within method and supervisor release |
| Rescue method unavailable for planned fall system | No exposed work | Practicable site-specific rescue arrangement |
| Lift route or roof load changed | Hold material placement | Approved lift and load review |
| Fire/chemical condition outside permit | Stop, secure and report | Site authority, permit and control review |
Record when work stopped, who moved to safety, who was contacted, the changed plan or permit, the control installed, the verifier and when the crew was rebriefed. For a fall-arrest method, verify the rescue plan before exposure. Waiting for municipal emergency services may be insufficient for the site's required rescue arrangement; the competent plan must address actual access and response. No worker should improvise a rescue in a way that creates a second casualty.
Crew sign-off and worked example
| Discussion point | Names/time/evidence |
|---|---|
| Crew identified roof edges, openings and weakest surface | |
| Approved access, fall system and rescue were explained | |
| Material and hot-work controls were confirmed | |
| People below and neighbouring trades were coordinated with | |
| Stop signal, change triggers and release authority were agreed |
Example: A crew is replacing membrane on a flat roof. The fall plan covers the perimeter and the load plan covers rolls staged by a crane. Once old membrane is stripped, the team finds a corroded deck beside a skylight. The FLHA records the changed surface and marks work there HOLD. The lead isolates the area, seeks a competent structural assessment and revises access, fall protection and material staging. Workers below are kept clear. The crew resumes only after the revised method and controls are verified and briefed. A note saying “watch your step” would not control the failure mechanism.
Existing owner, links and Complys boundary
The live Canadian hazard-assessment guide owns the general process; the Canadian tools directory is an observed entry point. The live UK roofing RAMS guide is jurisdiction- and document-specific and does not own a Canadian workface FLHA. This proposed URL serves the blank roofing field form and must avoid copying UK fall rules. Check all unpublished/repository owners before publication. The manifest's /ca/hazard-assessment-software route has not been confirmed live. Verify the exact destination and product implementation before linking or making a capability claim. A safe CTA is: Ask Complys how roof-task hazard records and corrective actions can be organised for your team. Software does not approve an anchor, assess structural capacity or carry out a rescue.
Source, claim, owner, product and writer-side QA register — 5 October 2026
| Check | Primary/observed evidence | Decision and gate |
|---|---|---|
| Roof-specific fall, access, hot-work and weather prompts | CCOHS roofing guidance | Practical guidance; verify local rule and task method. |
| Fall-control hierarchy | CCOHS hierarchy | No universal anchor, height or setback specified. |
| Ontario construction training example | Ontario working-at-heights training | Applies only within the stated Ontario project/equipment scope. |
| Existing-owner/cannibalisation | CA hazard guide, CA tools, UK roofing RAMS | Canadian roofing FLHA task form distinct; unpublished/repo check pending. |
| Product, link and copy QA | Observed CA entry points; direct answer, reusable form, stop/release and example | Money route and implementation unverified; READY writer-side, independent QA pending. |
Terminal writer-side disposition: READY. No Complys website or repository content was modified.